Martin

The Sustainability Signal

What changed. Why it matters. What to do about it.

Issue #3 · Week of February 10, 2026 · 5 min read

$ scan --sources 47 --week 2026-02-10

> Scanning regulatory bodies, ESG sources, climate data...

Done. 7 stories compiled. 6 sections ready.

 

THE BIG STORY

 

A Federal Court Just Killed the Anti-ESG Playbook — And 11 States Are on the Clock

On 4 February, a U.S. federal court declared Texas Senate Bill 13 — the law that launched America's anti-ESG movement — unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Judge Alan Albright found that SB 13's definition of “boycotting” fossil fuels was so broad it swept in constitutionally protected speech, and so vague that key terms were undefined and unmeasurable.

SB 13, enacted in 2021, forced state agencies to divest from financial companies on a “boycott” blacklist — which included BlackRock, HSBC, and BNP Paribas — and required vendors to certify they wouldn't boycott fossil fuels. Around 14 states followed with similar laws.

11

states with laws now facing direct constitutional exposure

Why it matters

This is the first federal court to strike down an anti-ESG statute (Oklahoma's state courts reached the same conclusion in 2024). At least 11 states — including Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Tennessee, and West Virginia — have laws with similarly vague language now directly exposed to constitutional challenge.

The irony: BlackRock was removed from the Texas blacklist in June 2025 after exiting Climate Action 100+ and leaving Net Zero Asset Managers. It made strategic concessions to a law that was unconstitutional from the day it was passed.

Monday morning action

If your firm operates in states with anti-ESG divestment laws, get legal to map exposure this week. Companies that modified ESG strategies to comply should assess whether those concessions are still necessary.

Source: Simpson Thacher · Reuters · Texas Tribune

 

AI x SUSTAINABILITY

 

White House Pushes Big Tech Toward Data Centre Energy Pact

The Trump administration is negotiating a voluntary compact with OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta on data centre energy, water, and community impacts. Under the draft agreement, AI developers would bear 100% of the cost of new power generation and sign long-term contracts to prevent costs shifting to consumers.

The political pressure is real. Goldman Sachs warned this week that U.S. electricity prices jumped 6.9% in 2025 — more than double headline inflation. A Harvard Belfer Center paper estimates data centre electricity could reach 325-580 TWh by 2028 (up from 176 TWh in 2023), or 6.7-12.0% of total U.S. electricity. Meanwhile, three frontier AI models launched in two weeks — Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.3 Codex, and Gemini 3 Deep Think — and none disclosed training energy, water use, or carbon footprint.

Politico · CNBC · Harvard Belfer Center

KPMG Demands AI Fee Cuts From Its Own Auditor

KPMG told Grant Thornton UK to cut audit fees because AI should make the work faster — and threatened to switch auditors. Result: a 14% fee reduction ($416K to $357K). The ESG angle: if AI is compressing financial audit costs, the same pressure is heading for sustainability assurance. CSRD's mandatory limited assurance is already live for wave 1 companies. AI could make assurance more affordable — or create a race to the bottom on quality.

Financial Times · Irish Times

 

CLIMATE & ENVIRONMENT

 

IEA: Renewables and Nuclear to Hit 50% of Global Power by 2030

The IEA's Electricity 2026 report forecasts renewables and nuclear at half of global electricity by 2030, up from 42% today. Demand is growing 3.5%+ annually — the equivalent of adding two European Unions. Renewables are on track to overtake coal. But grid infrastructure is the bottleneck: 2,500 GW of projects stuck in connection queues, and grid investment must rise 50% by 2030.

IEA Electricity 2026

TotalEnergies Signs 1 GW Solar PPA With Google

TotalEnergies signed 15-year PPAs to deliver 1 GW of solar (28 TWh) to Google's Texas data centres — the oil major's largest-ever U.S. renewable deal. Combined with Clearway deals, TotalEnergies now influences 2.2 GW of Google's U.S. power supply. Oil majors powering AI with renewables: the corporate PPA market is where decarbonisation investment is actually flowing.

TotalEnergies · Reuters

 

REGULATORY & POLICY

 

EU Bans Destruction of Unsold Clothing From July 2026

What changed: European Commission adopted measures under the ESPR banning destruction of unsold apparel, accessories, and footwear.

Who's affected: Large companies from 19 July 2026. Medium-sized from 2030. Covers fashion, footwear, retail, and e-commerce in the EU.

Key date: 19 July 2026

What to do: Review inventory management and returns processes. 4-9% of unsold textiles are destroyed pre-wear, generating ~5.6Mt CO2 annually. Shift to resale, remanufacturing, or donation — “we couldn't sell it” is no longer a legal excuse.

European Commission · Business of Fashion

 

CORPORATE & FINANCE

 

Deutsche Bank Issues First G-SIB European Green Bond

Deutsche Bank raised EUR 500M through its inaugural bond under the new European Green Bond Standard — the first by a Global Systemically Important Bank. The bond refinances EU Taxonomy-compliant residential mortgages with ISS Corporate providing an independent SPO. The EU Green Bond Standard requires asset-level Taxonomy alignment — a step change from self-labelled green bonds. Access to ESG capital increasingly depends on regulatory-grade frameworks, not marketing claims.

Deutsche Bank · ESG Dive

 

MARTIN'S TAKE

 

Here's what the market missed about the anti-ESG collapse: it was always political theatre, not legal substance. These statutes were drafted to score electoral points, not to withstand First Amendment scrutiny. Companies that changed course — exiting climate networks, watering down exclusion policies — made strategic concessions to laws that were never going to survive a constitutional challenge.

Meanwhile, the actual regulatory architecture keeps building. The EU tightened green bond standards. The ESPR's clothing ban starts in July. The IEA projects renewables at 50% of global power by 2030. Even the Trump White House is pushing tech companies toward energy commitments because AI-driven electricity costs have become a political liability — prices up 6.9% last year. That's the kind of number that changes elections.

The real question isn't whether anti-ESG laws survive. They won't. It's whether companies that retreated can rebuild the credibility they abandoned.

“The firms that retreated from ESG under political pressure are about to discover that the legal pendulum swings faster than the reputational one. Rebuilding credibility takes longer than abandoning it.”

— Martin

 

Ready to find your ESG gaps?

Upload your report. Get AI-powered analysis in minutes.

Get Your Analysis

Know someone who'd find this useful?

Forward this email or share the signup link

 

That's the signal for this week. See you next Monday.

martin.report · LinkedIn · Insights

AI-generated | Human-reviewed | martin.report

Keep Reading